Amid all the self-congratulatory anti-Cuban propagandan
emanating from Washington D.C. these days about Elian
Gonzalez, and where he belongs, it's hard to take much of it
very seriously.
None of the media blowhard apologists, despite all their
supposed analysis of why Cuba is such a terrible place, face
up honestly to two or three simple facts. But you can't really
blame them; their blindness is a function of their
indoctrination into the official party line of American
elites.
-
Where would you rather be born to poor parents: Washington
D.C. or Havana?
Havana's infant mortality rate for 1997 was about
half of Washington D.C.'s.
-
If you didn't know what your socio-economic level or your
"race" was going to be, where would you rather live:
American or Cuba?
Cuba may not be a very rich country -- and the American
blockade has basically insured that it can't be -- but
if you didn't know where you'd end up, the only rational
thing to choose would be Cuban citizenship. Sure, you
might be Bill Gates, in America but the odds are that
you'd end up making $6.25 an hour asking "would you like
fries with that?"
-
Where would you rather get sick?
Cuba has universal health care, and average life
expectancies that are nearly identical to American ones
(ok: American women live on average about 6 months
longer than Cuban women; other than that, it's a wash.)
In America, there are literally tens of millions of
people, including millions of children, who have no
certain health care.
Ok, ok, I know what you're thinking: Cuba doesn't have Nikes
or Pokemon or Microsoft Office.
Ok, so maybe consumer electronics and Celine Dion CDs and TV
dinners really are more important to you than health care.
That's fine. But doncha think that the blowhards on television
who keep telling everyone that Cuba is an evil totalitarian
nightmare should be telling us the whole truth?