If you are even a casual lurker on a newsgroup, or subscribe
to a few mailing lists, or simply browse the web occasionally,
it's likely that you've been struck by how helpful folks can
be. Advice, technical support, moral support, shared
experiences, and so on are easily to be had. People will spend
a good deal of time walking you through a tricky install, or
pointing you to the right book, or warning you about a bad
deal.
(Indeed, recently, after receiving two answers to his question
in under an hour on the Squeak list, a rather nice
fellow exclaimed that the technical help he paid for
was far inferior.)
Of course, a large chunk of the questions asked are by
beginners who often don't even know how to ask the right sorts
of questions. This is one reason for that hoary institution,
the FAQ.
These phenomena are hardly new. The generous flow of
information---between experts and newbies, amateurs and
professionals, friends and acquaintances, coworkers,
neighbors, teachers, librarians, public lecturers, and so
on---is a binding part of civil society.
A key aspect of this flow is that it is not typically a
succession of transactions, donated or otherwise. There are
exceptions (I think of the bulletin boards of the 1980s which
required you to upload a certain amount before you could
download; but, of course, they conceptualized "downloadables"
as tangible goods, which made them more like potlucks), and it
is certainly possible for spoilers to demand or to provoke the
demand that certain folks "give something back". But it is a
mistake to take the pathological situation as central, as
inevitable, or as the practical.
"Infomarkets" is a
sad and repellant attempt to commercialize in the most
objectionable way possible these phenomena. It makes each
question and answer a brute, money based transaction---with
auction style bidding, no less!
To the obvious, boring, oft-stated objection that people have
to make livings, I respond thusly: Grow up. There are ample
structures of information and wisdom transfer that allow for
the earning of one's daily bread without making every aspect
of one's interaction a sale. Hiring a tutor is fundamentally
different from calling a technical support line for $5 a
question. Teachers get paid, and students pay tuition, but
teachers are not "employeed" by the students. The students are
not their customers. Or, at least, they haven't been, and, I
sincerely hope, they will not become such.
I will add that there could be such a system with a
touch of class. Infomarkets, however, is as crass as it
gets. Both the proprietors and the participents are cretins
(though I have sympathy for the the "seekers").
Here's a
little sample, which, from the amount of surveying I could
stand, seems typical:
Question from "Darth Neon": Most people are aware of
"sniping" software that will place a bid at the last possible
second. But is there any software that will automatically
retract a bid at a set time? I'd like to know where I can buy
or download it, and if you're a programmer I might be
interested in hiring you to write software that would do this.
email me with any questions XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Pitch (for $5) from "knowitall": I am an EXPERT on eBay
and I am related to a person eBay's customer support team. I
can help!
It is at this point that I quickly retreat to my local public
library, after answering a few questions, gratis, for friends
and for strangers.