Jeffrey Rosen's cover story last week in The New Republic got
me thinking about cops again. Namely, that there's been a lot
of hollering about police brutality since the NYPD shot some
innocent people. So I wondered, is this community policing
thing not working out?
Now, I know a few cops. I worked around them for 18 months as
a police reporter. Generally, they have enough fights with
drunks who start brawls that they're not looking for one with
someone minding his own business. The live-and-let-live
atmosphere can actually be helped by "broken window" policing,
in which the cops are actively involved in knowing their
communities, and maintaining a reasonable sense of order. When
cops know people and walk the street, rather than merely
reacting to crime calls from their patrol vehicles, they know
when to talk rather than bust, and they can prevent more crime
than they ever solve.
But New York, as Rosen sez, has taken a good idea -- the
"broken window" policing theory -- and turned it into a way to
catch more hardcore bad guys. By hassling and frisking every
young guy not wearing a tie in New York (which means, mainly
Hispanic and black guys), the cops are catching a lot of
felons with outstanding warrants. They're also getting
themselves into situations where they shoot people who weren't
doing anything, not to mention pissing off the people who
wanted better law enforcement to begin with (the poor folks
who are the most likely targets of crimes).
But is this a national trend, to be blamed on "broken window"
policing (as that gripstick Alexander
Cockburn insists)? Not from the evidence. In Boston and
Chicago, community policing has coincided with New York-like
drops in crime, without an increase in citizen complaints. The
Rampart thing in L.A. is just old-fashioned corruption and
laziness, not related to community policing.
And police brutality, while a bad thing to be punished, isn't
anywhere near as large a contributor to lumps on heads as are,
say, Saturday night fights at redneck bars. The Bureau
of Justice Statistics found that fewer than 5 percent of
arrests in six cities studied involved even the threat of the
use of a weapon. Cops were more likely to be hurt themselves
than the people they arrested when force was used (half
the time, the use of force involved a drunk suspect).
Cops in general are not the problem. Jerkoff mayors who wish
they could be dictator of Singapore are the problem.